Asterisk PBXFEATUREDFreeSWITCHLatestOpenSIPSTOP STORIESVOIPWebRTC

TURN Servers: Ensuring Reliable WebRTC & VoIP Calls

Most WebRTC and VoIP conversations fail for one simple reason:
devices can’t reach each other through firewalls and NATs.

If you’ve ever experienced:

  • one-way audio
  • calls not connecting
  • video freezing
  • “connecting…” screens that never end
  • WebRTC softphones failing on certain networks

…you’ve run into NAT traversal issues.

And the most important — and least understood — component solving this problem is the TURN server.

In today’s article, we’ll explore what TURN servers are, why they’re mandatory for modern WebRTC systems, how they differ from STUN, and why businesses should be monitoring them closely.


What Exactly Is a TURN Server?

TURN stands for Traversal Using Relays around NAT — a protocol that allows audio, video, and data to pass through restrictive networks.

When two devices cannot establish a peer-to-peer connection (because of corporate firewalls, symmetric NAT, carrier restrictions, or blocked ports), a TURN server acts as a relay for media.

➡ STUN finds your public IP
➡ TURN actually relays the media when STUN isn’t enough

This means the TURN server becomes the path for:

  • full audio
  • full video
  • data channels
  • ICE candidates that fail directly

For a technical breakdown:
👉 https://webrtc.org/getting-started/overview
👉 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5766


TURN vs STUN: Why One Is Not Enough

Many beginners assume STUN and TURN are interchangeable. They are not.

STUN (Session Traversal Utilities for NAT)

  • Discovers your public IP
  • Works only when NAT/firewall rules are permissive
  • Lightweight, fast, and free

TURN

  • Relays actual media streams
  • Works even in the most restrictive corporate and carrier environments
  • CPU and bandwidth intensive
  • Requires proper scaling and deployment

According to WebRTC project maintainers, TURN is required for 10–25% of global users — typically those behind enterprise firewalls or 4G/5G carrier networks.
👉 https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/WebRTC_API/Connectivity

Without TURN, a large portion of your audience simply cannot connect.


Why TURN Is Crucial for VoIP, PBX, and WebRTC Softphones

1. Corporate Networks Are Getting Stricter

Modern firewalls block:

  • UDP
  • non-standard ports
  • unknown RTP flows
  • cross-site communication

TURN enables connectivity in environments where direct media is impossible.

2. Mobile Networks Often Use Symmetric NAT

Many carriers break peer-to-peer paths entirely.

TURN gives WebRTC softphones and VoIP apps a reliable fallback.

3. It Prevents One-Way Audio & Failed Calls

Most one-way audio issues originate from NAT blocking inbound packets.

TURN solves this by routing media through a stable, reachable relay.

4. Essential for Mixed SIP/WebRTC Environments

When connecting browsers to PBX systems like:

  • Asterisk
  • FreeSWITCH
  • FusionPBX
  • OpenSIPS / Kamailio

TURN ensures media can traverse both legacy and modern network conditions.


How TURN Works Inside the ICE Framework

WebRTC uses ICE (Interactive Connectivity Establishment) to test possible connection paths. The sequence looks like this:

  1. Try host candidates (local network)
  2. Try STUN server candidates
  3. Try TURN relay candidates
  4. Whichever succeeds first becomes the media path

If STUN fails, TURN becomes mandatory — not optional.


Best Practices for TURN Deployment

Use Both UDP and TCP

UDP is ideal, but many enterprise networks block it.
TCP and TLS TURN ports (443) maximise reliability.

Always Enable Authentication

Anonymous TURN is a major security risk.

Scale for Bandwidth

TURN relays actual media — it consumes real bandwidth.

Expect 1–3 Mbps per active HD video session.

Deploy Multiple Geographic Nodes

Latency matters. Choose data centres near:

  • Africa (if targeting SA market)
  • Europe
  • US West / East
  • APAC

Open-Source TURN Servers to Know

Here are three industry-trusted and actively maintained options:

Coturn (most popular & widely deployed)
👉 https://github.com/coturn/coturn

Restund
👉 https://github.com/creytiv/restund

rfc5766-turn-server
👉 https://github.com/tyrone-bett/rfc5766-turn-server

Coturn is overwhelmingly preferred in production because of its stability, support for TURN/TLS, and flexible authentication mechanisms.


The Future of TURN: Smarter, Faster, More Secure

As remote communication grows, TURN servers are evolving to support:

  • QUIC-based relay mechanisms
  • advanced DDoS protection
  • adaptive bandwidth steering
  • integration with cloud edge networks
  • built-in WebRTC analytics

TURN will remain a cornerstone of reliable communication for:

  • browser softphones
  • PBX extensions
  • mobile VoIP apps
  • embedded call widgets
  • enterprise WebRTC deployments

Final Thoughts

TURN servers may not be visible to end users, but they are absolutely essential to making WebRTC and VoIP work in the real world — especially behind firewalls, on mobile networks, and in restrictive enterprise environments.

If your communication system depends on browser calling, mobile SIP clients, or cloud PBX functions, TURN is the silent guardian keeping everything connected.

For more articles like this, visit SoftpageCMS.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *